Websites for US architects — built around how clients shortlist a firm. AIA and state license credentials, a portfolio-led layout and full-bleed case studies that match the work.
Real templates we can spin up for your practice — open any of them to see the design, copy and feel for a residential, commercial or heritage client.
Clients commissioning architecture — homeowners spending $800k+ on a build, developers picking a delivery partner — shortlist by what the website signals. If your site doesn't look as considered as the buildings, you don't make the meeting.
Clients can't tell from a brief alone whether a firm's taste matches their project. The website is the only proxy. A site that's understated, photographed properly and quietly confident is the difference between a meeting and a polite decline.
Each completed project gets its own full-bleed case study — drawings, photography, brief, completed result. Indexed individually so each ranks for residential, commercial, historic, adaptive-reuse and sector-specific intent.
ZIP code and historic-district-targeted SEO, Google Business Profile setup, real client reviews. You show up when a homeowner with a 1920s craftsman in your metro is looking.
AIA member, licensed architect, NCARB certified, state architecture license, historic-district track record — pulled into the header. The reassurance a client needs before a $40k fee commitment.
Every feature on this list earns its place by either signalling taste, building credibility, or shortening the path from visit to a first meeting.
Project gallery is the home page, not buried under services. Each project is a full-bleed case study — drawings, photography, brief, scope, outcome. The page leads with the work because that's how clients pick architects.
Each delivered project becomes its own URL — residential, commercial, historic, adaptive reuse, net-zero, passive house. Indexed for sector and typology intent.
If your firm holds AIA membership, NCARB certification, a state architecture license, LEED accreditation or historic-preservation credentials — we put them where they belong, with license numbers linking to the state board lookup. No badge, no problem; we leave them off.
Not a generic contact form — captures project type, location, budget band, permit and zoning stage. Routes to the right partner directly. Built for someone serious about a commission, not casual browsing.
Type set the way an architect would set it — generous leading, no padding, no agency-template clutter. Photography at full bleed. The same restraint the work shows.
Pages built to score >95 on Lighthouse with full-resolution photography intact. Slow architect sites lose clients in the first 1.5 seconds; this won't.
Three residential commissions in the first six months after launch, two of them $1.2M+ builds. The portfolio-led layout did the qualifying — clients arrived already aligned with our taste.
The site finally feels like the firm we are. Three AIA design-award shortlists since launch, none of which would have happened on the old site.
Historic and adaptive-reuse inquiries doubled. Clients with landmarked and century-old properties now find us specifically because the case-study pages name the typology.
I'm a sole practitioner. The new site reads as confidently as a 20-person studio. I've been turning work away for the first time in eight years.
The questions architects ask before they hit the “get a price” button.
An architect website from ConstructionWebExperts is $2,000, fixed price, or $3,000 with branding. Freelancers charge $75–$150/hour and agencies want $10,000–$40,000 per project over 8–12 weeks. Hosting and SSL are included for the first year, and there are no monthly fees.
Seven days from kickoff to a live site. ConstructionWebExperts uses a proven architect template, drops in your portfolio, AIA and license credentials, project case studies and team biographies, and ships it. A full custom build takes much longer.
Portfolio as the centerpiece, project case-study pages (one per delivered build), AIA and state license credentials in the header, firm biography, services framed around typology (residential / commercial / historic / adaptive reuse), and a first-meeting booking form. ConstructionWebExperts ships all of that by default.
Yes. Clients commissioning architecture — homeowners spending $800k+ on a build, developers picking a delivery partner — shortlist by Googling the firm's portfolio before they call; without a website you're invisible at shortlist stage. ConstructionWebExperts builds architect-specific sites that fix exactly this.
One that gets out of the way of the photography. Full-bleed images, generous type, project case studies as individual URLs, and zero template clutter. ConstructionWebExperts builds the portfolio-led template so the work — not the layout — is the thing clients remember.
Yes. Every architect site ConstructionWebExperts builds ships with firm SEO baked in: schema markup, project case-study pages indexed individually for typology intent (residential / commercial / historic / adaptive reuse / passive house), ZIP code keywords and Google Business Profile setup.
Yes — that's the architect template's whole premise. The home page leads with the portfolio, every project is a full-bleed case study, and services are framed around the typology of work rather than generic web-agency bullet lists. ConstructionWebExperts treats the portfolio as the conversion engine.
Absolutely — a meaningful share of the architects ConstructionWebExperts builds for are sole practitioners. The template scales from a one-person firm to a small studio; we adjust the team page, case-study count and firm scale accordingly. Pricing is the same fixed $2,000 either way.
Same approach, tuned to each trade — pick yours and see a landing page built just for it.
Fixed price. Live in seven days. A website that reads as considered as the buildings you make.
